RFC: Using per function sections
Matt Wette
mwette at alumni.caltech.edu
Fri Apr 12 00:37:42 UTC 2013
I'm guessing this is "gcc -ffunction-sections". Can the sections be padded?
The use case is updating functions (in flash) and not entire s/w.
(This was used on a project at work and worked for limited bandwidth to the computer.)
On Apr 11, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi
>
> After Anthony Green commented how much code space was
> saved by using per function sections, I have been doing some
> experimenting on a few targets. My impression is:
>
> + Some tests drop > 50% in size
> + Most drop 20-30%
> + Minimum drop is ~10%
> + Even a well tuned size constrained BSP like the lpc23xx_tli800
> saw 6-9% minimum improvements. At least one test fit into
> memory which did not before hand.
>
> PowerPC and ARM appear to work great. SPARC/sis resulted in 80
> byte .text sections.
>
> I would like to know if there is general interest in using these
> options across all BSPs where it works. And investigating those
> which do not.
>
> --
> Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
> joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
> Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
> Support Available (256) 722-9985
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
More information about the users
mailing list