Problem with rtems_event_send crashing from interrupt routine

Joel Sherrill joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com
Fri Jun 12 20:15:24 UTC 2015



On 6/12/2015 2:35 PM, Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote:
>
>> On 2015-June-12, at 1:02 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Mr. Andrei Chichak <groups at chichak.ca> wrote:
>>> Does it make any sense that I can bypass the problem with the watchdogs by
>>> calling rtems_event_receive with a timeout of RTEMS_NO_TIMEOUT?
>>>
>> Yes, the event will not go into the watchdog if there is no time out.
>> (However, chasing this bug down a little bit is beneficial to others.
>> Or posting a test case that demonstrates it.)
>
> I’ll give it a go. From what I’ve seen it should work with one process generating events at a high rate and the other consuming, but it needs to be shown.

Random thought. Are you running with --enable-debug? I am not sure
if what is happening will trip any internal consistency checks but
a hint is a hint if it does.

> A
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985



More information about the users mailing list