rtems-addon-packages removed?

Matt Rippa mrippa at gemini.edu
Thu Nov 10 19:17:41 UTC 2016


Thanks for the info. Any reason why the rtems-libbspext couldn't live on
git.rtems.org ? I think this link exists mostly for Michael's epics/debian
distribution.

Anyway, looks like I have enough to make an RSB recipe.

-Matt

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Matt Rippa <mrippa at gemini.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Joel,
>>
>> I'm trying to build rtems-4.10.2 strictly with rsb. When it comes to the
>> rtems-addon packages it's not clear there's any build set to accomplish
>> this. As a work around I cloned git://git.rtems.org/rte
>> ms-addon-packages.git and switched to the rtems-addon-packages-4-10-branch.
>> Building this works fine except the libbspExt package is missing. This is
>> required for us to build EPICS.
>>
>>
> libbspExt was never part of RTEMS. It was developed atSLAC. I found this:
>
> https://github.com/epicsdeb/rtems-libbspext
>
> And this is where it originated.
>
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~strauman/rtems/software.html
>
> If there is a newer version, I don't know.  It was always a SLAC/EPICS
> addon.
> It is a good candidate for an RSB recipe.
>
>
>> To proceed with a 4.10.2 install for EPICS, I had to:
>>
>> 1. $ cd rtems-addon
>> 2. $ wget --passive-ftp --no-directories --retr-symlinks
>> www.slac.stanford.edu/~strauman/rtems/rtems_libbspExt_1.5.tgz
>> 3. unpack, make, make install
>> 4. rebuild EPICS
>>
>> Is there a known rsb build-set for 4.10.2 or even a git branch for 4.10.2
>> that includes libbspExt_1_5?
>>
>> The SLAC link I posted has 1.5 and 1.6.
>
> Good opportunity to create an RSB recipe and submit it. It would be
> appreciated.
>
> FWIW one for EPICS itself would be awesome and appreciated.
>
>
>> -Matt
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm going to dig back through my sent email. I know I worked on them.
>>> Maybe I sent them to the list or Chris directly for review and they never
>>> got merged.
>>>
>>> On Oct 1, 2016 9:08 AM, "Michael Westfall" <mwestfal at gemini.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> But the rtems-addon-packages had things like ncurses, readline and
>>> libtecla..
>>> Are those somewhere in RSB now?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/10/16 3:04 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> On Sep 30, 2016 10:49 AM, "Gedare Bloom" <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Looks like it was renamed: https://git.rtems.org/libbsdport/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> That's the port of newer drivers to the old tcpip stack.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Also, https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2469 indicates some progress
>>>> was made
>>>> >>> to convert it to RSB configurations/recipes, after which the git
>>>> repo would
>>>> >>> become obsolete.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> That's the reason. You can build them all with the rsb. The graphics
>>>> toolkit
>>>> >> has only a couple of packages left and it follows the same fate.
>>>> >>
>>>> > Where are the recipes in the RSB? A quick look was not obvious.
>>>>
>>>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/tree/rtems/config/graphics
>>>>
>>>> which means names like:
>>>>
>>>>  graphics/tllib
>>>>  graphics/microwindows
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> users at rtems.org
>>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mike Westfall
>>> Control Systems Software Engineer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> users at rtems.org
>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> users at rtems.org
>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161110/784d666e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the users mailing list