RTOS Comparison

[Joel Sherrill]

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> Please refrain from inclusion of sponsored links or advertisements in your
> e-mail messages to this mailing list.
>
> I guess we need to add this now to our 'mailing list policies'
> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/TBR/Website/RTEMSMailingLists#Policies
>
>
It already includes this:

*  Please avoid using a mail client that automatically appends content to
your messages, such as sponsored advertisements, disclaimers, etc.

What needs to be changed to cover this situation?


> Gedare
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:35 PM, warm38 at juno.com <warm38 at juno.com> wrote:
>
>> Round 2:
>>
>> Our company is looking into using an RTOS very soon.  The ones examined
>> (by a company in India who does our protocol stacks) are:
>> FreeRTOS,  Segger Emb-OS,  Micrium,  Threadx.
>>
>> Can anyone (Joel?) fill in the following for RTEMS so I can add in my 2
>> cents in for RTEMS?  We are working with Cortex M4 and M7 (STM32L4 and
>> Atmel SAM4 & SAM7).
>>
>> Kernel size (ROM)
>>
>> Kernel RAM usage
>>
>> Kernel Type
>>
>> Scheduling
>>
>> Scalability
>>
>> Min. stack-size per task (RAM)
>>
>> Max. no. of tasks
>>
>> Max. no. of mailboxes
>>
>> Max. no. of semaphores
>>
>> Max. no. of software timers
>>
>> Max. no. of priorities
>>
>> Nested interrupts
>>
>> Task switches from within ISR
>>
>> Context switch time
>>
>> Interrupt latency time
>>
>> Atmel studio 7/ASF - Tool compatibility
>>
>> Royalty Fee
>>
>> License Cost
>>
>> Networking
>>
>> POSIX compliant
>>
>> any tools to avoid priority inversion
>>
>> users mailing list
>> users at rtems.org
>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160921/5edba53d/attachment-0002.html>