How to use rtems_event_system_send and rtems_event_system_receive?
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Mon Jul 30 06:16:36 UTC 2018
On 27/07/18 17:45, Cliff Geschke wrote:
> Hello Sebastian,
> I'm afraid that moving to version 5.x would have even more incompatibilities to
> deal with.
what are the incompatibilities. Maybe we can fix some of the
incompatibilities before the RTEMS 5.1 release.
> I tried the hack and it seems to work okay. It was a mystery as to why my waits
> on SBWAIT were never satisfied. I would have appreciated a mention of the new
> system events somewhere.
The system events are mentioned in the release notes:
However, it is not mentioned that they are used by the network stack.
You can improve the release notes if you like.
> If I were adding system events, I think I would extend the event mask to be 64
> bits and then let the user routines access only the low 32 bits. But let the
> system routines access them all.
RTEMS is not made of stone. You can still change the system event
implementation if you think it is worth to do it.
> Thanks for the advice.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sebastian Huber [mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 3:36 AM
> To: Cliff Geschke; users at rtems.org
> Subject: Re: How to use rtems_event_system_send and rtems_event_system_receive?
> Hello Cliff,
> On 26/07/18 22:27, Cliff Geschke wrote:
>> I am migrating an application from RTEMS 4.6 to 4.11
> I would directly migrate to the latest RTEMS master if you do such a
> huge version step.
>> I see that the BSD stack now uses the new rtems_event_system_receive()
>> and rtems_event_system_send() rather than the older rtems_event_*().
>> I cannot find any documentation or guidelines for
>> rtems_event_system_*. Can anyone point me to them?
> These functions should be only used by the system and not application
> code. Therefore they are not documented in the user guide.
>> In my application, I want to wait for the OR of system event SBWAIT
>> and some user-defined events. Is there an efficient way to wait for
>> both a system event or a user event?
> No, they are separated. You can only wait for one or the other.
>> Do I need to hack my application to use system events rather than user
>> events? That seems to defeat the purpose of having system events.
> Yes, currently this hack is the only solution. I think the basic problem
> is that RTEMS offers no general purpose event system such as kqueue() or
> epoll(). In libbsd (the new network stack), we support kqueue().
> Depending on your target, the libbsd might be an option.
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the users