RTEMS in AMP mode

Fri Oct 19 06:41:40 UTC 2018

----- Am 19. Okt 2018 um 2:17 schrieb Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org:

> On 18/10/2018 15:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 17/10/2018 18:03, Alan Cudmore wrote:
>>> Is the POSIX API preferred for RTEMS applications moving forward?
>> 
>> I would use standard APIs such as POSIX, C++11 or boost.
>> 
> 
> Does this mean https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2514 is finished and can be
> closed?

No, but there is not much left to do. There is a pending patch set here:

https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2018-October/023316.html