Someone using CONFIGURE_HAS_OWN_DEVICE_DRIVER_TABLE?

[Joel Sherrill]

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, 2:10 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> is the CONFIGURE_HAS_OWN_DEVICE_DRIVER_TABLE actually used in
> application configurations?
>

I seriously hope not. It was absolutely needed before the addition of the
various configuration parameters to add bsp and application specific driver
entries at the beginning and end of the table.

I added those to stop someone (Eric Norum?) from needing to define their
own table.

FWIW I would be happy to see all the define your own table options
disappear as long as we have covered the case for someone to add a custom
entry to arrays like this and the filesystem table.

--joel

>
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190409/a9d4df86/attachment-0002.html>