Someone using CONFIGURE_HAS_OWN_INIT_TASK_TABLE?
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Tue Apr 9 12:55:57 UTC 2019
On 09/04/2019 14:50, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, 2:08 AM Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
> is the CONFIGURE_HAS_OWN_INIT_TASK_TABLE actually used in application
> After sending that last email, this one is more likely to be used than
> any of the others.
> Not responding to an email on the list doesn't mean it isn't used.
> If this option is deleted, the comparable POSIX one must go. then you
> get a single init task of one or both APIs.
This one actually doesn't cause great pain to me at the moment. I just
wanted to know if it actually used. Removing it would simplify things a
bit, but not much.
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the users