RTEMS POSIX Priority Inversion Issue.

Thu Jan 10 06:50:11 UTC 2019

Dear Sir,

I re-started to test this again using RTEMS 5.0 lastest version.

First of all, I am testing RTEMS for Realview PBX A9 on QEMU machine.

As I check this on single core, example is working very well. 

Also, pthread priority value range is from 0 to 255. It is correct information.

Because I use my real target(Cortex-A9) using RTEMS old version with SMP configuration, I would like to test RTEMS 5.0 version with SMP configuration.

When I tested this on QEMU machine with “-smp 2” or “-smp 4”, S/W exception was occurred.

Please let me know how to configure SMP for RealView PBX A9.

Best Regards,

JunBeom

From: JunBeom Kim (EmbedCoreTech) <jbkim at e-coretech.kr> 
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 2:24 PM
To: 'joel at rtems.org' <joel at rtems.org>
Cc: '구철회' <chkoo at kari.re.kr>; 'rtems-users at rtems.org' <users at rtems.org>
Subject: RE: RTEMS POSIX Priority Inversion Issue.

Dear Joel,

Thank you for your advice.

I will check this from RTEMS 4.12 and RTEMS 5.0.

After I check this, I will share update information.

Have a good weekend and Happy new year.

Best Regards,

JunBeom

From: Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org <mailto:joel at rtems.org> > 
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 1:46 AM
To: JunBeom Kim (EmbedCoreTech) <jbkim at e-coretech.kr <mailto:jbkim at e-coretech.kr> >
Cc: 구철회 <chkoo at kari.re.kr <mailto:chkoo at kari.re.kr> >; rtems-users at rtems.org <mailto:rtems-users at rtems.org>  <users at rtems.org <mailto:users at rtems.org> >
Subject: Re: RTEMS POSIX Priority Inversion Issue.

Hi

I'm off for the holidays and answering from my phone. My suspicion is that the pthread command is an alias for the tasks command. Thus it is not reporting the priority from the view of the POSIX API but from the view of the Classic API. Internally all threads and tasks are instances of SuperCore threads and the priorities are mapped to what is required by the API.

Priority 1 in Classic API is 254 in POSIX. 

Please investigate the code for the pthread command and see if I am right. This would be a minor bug in the shell rather than a priority inversion issue.

--joel

On Fri, Dec 28, 2018, 1:21 AM JunBeom Kim (EmbedCoreTech) <jbkim at e-coretech.kr <mailto:jbkim at e-coretech.kr>  wrote:

Dear Mr. Koo.

There is not any relationship between main thread and pthread1/2/3.

Main thread is run on core 1 of Cortex-A9.

Pthread1/2/3 threads is run on core 2 of Cortex-A9.

That is, both main thread and pthread1/2/3 is run on each cores independently.

Also, I used manual affinity using pthread_setaffinity_np().

Pthread1/2/3 is created by main thread.

and, actual operation is using Qt Thread API. I attached simple example code.

Qt Thread API is calling RTEMS POSIX API.

Best Regards,

JunBeom

From: chkoo at kari.re.kr <mailto:chkoo at kari.re.kr>  <chkoo at kari.re.kr <mailto:chkoo at kari.re.kr> > 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2018 4:05 PM
To: JunBeom Kim (EmbedCoreTech) <jbkim at e-coretech.kr <mailto:jbkim at e-coretech.kr> >
Cc: users at rtems.org <mailto:users at rtems.org> 
Subject: RE: RTEMS POSIX Priority Inversion Issue.

What is the relation between main thread and pthread1/2/3?

If the main thread has a control to wake up each pthread1/2/3, it gonna be in trouble when the prioirty of the main thread is lower than pthread1/2/3s because the main thread has never chance to run it, which is required to other threads.

However why do you assign so much long integer value to priority?

Cheol

--------- 원본 메일 ---------

보낸사람 : "JunBeom Kim (EmbedCoreTech)" <jbkim at e-coretech.kr <mailto:jbkim at e-coretech.kr> >
받는사람 : <users at rtems.org <mailto:users at rtems.org> >
받은날짜 : 2018-12-28 (금) 15:45:48
제목 : RTEMS POSIX Priority Inversion Issue.

Dear Sir, 

I am testing RTEMS POSIX thread priority. 

I am still using RTEMS 4.12 in 2017 year. 

There are four pthreads(main, pthread1, pthread2, pthread3) on two cores in my test case. 

- main pthread is running on core 1. 

- pthread1, pthread2, pthread3 is running on core 2. 

- All threads are doing GPIO toggling action in while(1) loop. 

- my configuration for timeslice quantum is 25ms. 

As I know from RTEMS POSIX manual, there is below statement. 

In the RTEMS implementation of the POSIX API, the priorities range from the low priority of 

sched_get_priority_min() to the highest priority of sched_get_priority_max(). Numerically 

higher values represent higher priorities. 

But, when I test this, lower value is doing as higher priority. Higher value is doing as lower priority. 

Is this correct operation ? 

Case 0) All threads are same priority. 

[/] # pthread 

ID       NAME             CPU SHED PRI STATE  MODES    EVENTS WAITINFO 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

0b010001  main_thread       1 MEDF 2147483645 READY P:T:nA   NONE   

0b010002  pthread1           2 MEDF 2147483645 READY P:T:nA   NONE   

0b010003  pthread2           2 MEDF 2147483645 READY P:T:nA   NONE   

0b010004  pthread3           2 MEDF 2147483645 READY P:T:nA   NONE 

Case 1) pthread3 is lower priority according to manual. But, pthread3 is higher priority in my case. 

[/] # pthread 

ID       NAME             CPU SHED PRI STATE  MODES    EVENTS WAITINFO 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

0b010001  main_thread       1 MEDF 2147483645 READY P:T:nA   NONE   

0b010002  pthread1           2 MEDF 2147483646 READY P:T:nA   NONE   

0b010003  pthread2           2 MEDF 2147483646 READY P:T:nA   NONE   

0b010004  pthread3           2 MEDF 1789569706 READY P:T:nA   NONE 

Case 2) pthread3 is higher priority according to manual. pthread1 and pthread2 are higher priority than pthread3. 

[/] # pthread 

ID       NAME             CPU SHED PRI STATE  MODES    EVENTS WAITINFO 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

0b010001  main_thread       1 MEDF 2147483645 READY P:T:nA   NONE   

0b010002  pthread1           2 MEDF 1789569706 READY P:T:nA   NONE   

0b010003  pthread2           2 MEDF 1789569706 READY P:T:nA   NONE   

0b010004  pthread3           2 MEDF 2147483646 READY P:T:nA   NONE 

Please advise. 

Best Regards, 

JunBeom Kim 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

President / EmbedCoreTech 

Phone: +82-31-396-5584 

Fax: +82-504-065-5720 

Mobile:+82-10-6425-5720 

Email: jbkim at e-coretech.kr <mailto:jbkim at e-coretech.kr>  

Web: www.e-coretech.kr <http://www.e-coretech.kr>  

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

  <https://webmail.kari.re.kr:443/checkread/MTA2NjIz/amJraW1AZS1jb3JldGVjaC5rcg==/> 

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at rtems.org <mailto:users at rtems.org> 
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190110/cfedcef6/attachment-0001.html>