change log for rtems (2011-06-29)

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 06/30/2011 02:48 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 01:01 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 06/29/2011 10:11 PM, rtems-vc at rtems.org wrote:
>>> *jennifer*:
>>> 2011-06-29 Ricardo Aguirre
>> IMNSHO, ChangeLog entries without email addresses should be not be
>> allowed, because
>> a) we need to have a contact address "in case of questions"
>> b) a name alone is insufficient to identify an individual "in case".
>>
>> I am going to revert all of this changes, should this not be possible.
>>
> Ralf.. chill. You catch more flies with honey than vinegar.
>
> Frankly this is a mild example of being rash and how you treat
> others on the mailing list in a condescending and hateful
> manner.
What is hateful about this?

I expressed my opinion in a strong way to make it unmisunderstandible 
clear what I think about this patch.

If this was GCC, Jennifer's patch would have been immediately be reverted.

And in case you are referring to my today's response to rtems-users ... 
I consider my response to be well formulated and appropriate,

> We are not your serfs.

... I am not your monkey.

> This is a community
> volunteer project and you are not king. Respect others
> and be polite.

Don't shoot when sitting in a glass house.

> I have fixed the ChangeLog. A simple "email address was
> missing" would have been more than sufficient and saved
> us both time.