change log for rtems (2011-10-18)

[Jennifer Averett]

Thanks.  You are correct, I was building with debug on 
and didn't catch it. 

Jennifer

________________________________________
From: rtems-vc-bounces at rtems.org [rtems-vc-bounces at rtems.org] On Behalf Of Joel Sherrill [joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 6:02 AM
To: Ralf Corsepius
Cc: rtems-vc at rtems.org
Subject: Re: change log for rtems (2011-10-18)

Thanks for spotting that. I wouldn't have expected a major issue from Jennifer. She is very diligent. I know this work has weeks of tinkering and compiling.

--joel

Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius at rtems.org> wrote:

>On 10/19/2011 07:32 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 10/18/2011 09:10 PM, rtems-vc at rtems.org wrote:
>>> *jennifer*
>>>
>>> 2011-10-18 Jennifer Averett<Jennifer.Averett at OARcorp.com
>>
>> [dynamic console]
>>
>> Jennifer, these changes seem to have broken building many (all?) BSPs.
>>
>> At least, many(all?) of my nightly builts seem to have failed due to
>> changes having been introduced by this patch - But I haven't yet tried
>> to investigate deeper ;)
>
>I believe to have found the cause. There was a piece of code in
>console.c, where RTEMS_DEBUG was used as a C-symbol. RTEMS_DEBUG,
>however is a #define.
>
>Seems to me, as if you where building with --enable-rtems-debug, while I
>built with rtems-debug disabled.
>
>Fix should be in CVS now.
>
>Ralf
>_______________________________________________
>rtems-vc mailing list
>rtems-vc at rtems.org
>http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-vc

_______________________________________________
rtems-vc mailing list
rtems-vc at rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-vc