[rtems-tools commit] Bugfix: binutils-2.20.1 couldn' t be build with a modern texinfo package.

[Sebastian Huber]

Module:    rtems-tools
Branch:    master
Commit:    45d2402047133819c43d8f080407bfc78ee77091
Changeset: http://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/commit/?id=45d2402047133819c43d8f080407bfc78ee77091

Author:    Götz Pfeiffer <pfeiffer at elbe.acc.bessy.de>
Date:      Thu Jan  7 15:13:05 2016 +0100

Bugfix: binutils-2.20.1 couldn't be build with a modern texinfo package.

The texinfo documentation of binutils contained some constructs that are
errors, at least for a modern version of texinfo (version 6.0 and newer). This
meant that binutils-2.20.1 couldn't be build e.g. on fedora-22.

A patch file was added to fix the problematic parts of the documentation.

Update #2520.

---

 .../binutils-2.20.1-rtems4.10-20151123.diff         | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/4.10/binutils/binutils-2.20.1-rtems4.10-20151123.diff b/tools/4.10/binutils/binutils-2.20.1-rtems4.10-20151123.diff
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..01ec563
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/4.10/binutils/binutils-2.20.1-rtems4.10-20151123.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+diff -Naur binutils-2.20.1-orig/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo binutils-2.20.1/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo
+--- binutils-2.20.1-orig/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo	2015-11-16 16:25:33.558111584 +0100
++++ binutils-2.20.1/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo	2015-11-16 16:25:45.101954752 +0100
+@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@
+ @printindex cp
+ 
+ @tex
+-% I think something like @colophon should be in texinfo.  In the
++% I think something like @@colophon should be in texinfo.  In the
+ % meantime:
+ \long\def\colophon{\hbox to0pt{}\vfill
+ \centerline{The body of this manual is set in}
+@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@
+ \centerline{{\sl\fontname\tensl\/}}
+ \centerline{are used for emphasis.}\vfill}
+ \page\colophon
+-% Blame: doc at cygnus.com, 28mar91.
++% Blame: doc@@cygnus.com, 28mar91.
+ @end tex
+ 
+ @bye