[PATCH] bsps/arm: replace CMSIS v4 with CMSIS v5 files

[Joel Sherrill]

If someone doesn't pipe up with complaints or questions in the next few
days, go ahead andcommit this.

--joel

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 3:55 AM Karel Gardas <karel at functional.vision>
wrote:

> On 7/14/23 01:24, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 4:11 PM Karel Gardas <karel at functional.vision>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >        Folks,
> >
> >     please take this patch as an attempt to renew old discussion or
> rather
> >     start a new one focused solely on importing new ARM CMSIS code which
> is
> >     (i) under Apache 2 license but (ii) without any NOTICE file.
> >
> >
> > The absence of a NOTICE file is OK. If they had one, we would just have
> > to pass it along.
> >
> > I recall the issue is that "You must cause any modified files to carry
> > prominent
> > notices stating that You changed the files"
> >
>
> OK, but this is even easier since I have not modified files at all. They
> are just verbatim copy.
>
> > My reading is that we would need to pass the NOTICE file along. I
> personally
> > do not see that as a burden unless it contains more than credit or
> > permissively
> > license info.
>
> OK! I think decision process itself of "unless it contains more than..."
> may be seen as a burden. But, fortunately no NOTICE file there, hence no
> issue...
>
> >     The patch itself is clear replace of existing files with a new files,
> >     plus required files added and old one not needed anymore removed.
> >
> >     The patch was very lightly tested by building several ARM BSPs
> >     especially those affected by the change.
> >
> >
> > Did you have any BSPs to actually test on? What ones can be tested
> > for this?
>
> Yes, I can run testsuite on 2 boards I have sitting idle here:
> stm32h747i-disco and stm32h7b3i-dk where 747 would test both M7 and M4
> variants. By comparing results from current tree and current tree +
> patch we may see any unexpected breakage...
>
> >     Thanks for any comments!
> >
> >
> > I'm happy with the update and think it is OK license wise. Technically,
> > it you
> > trust it, I'm ok with it.
>
> Cool! Thanks,
>
> Karel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20230714/86d5084f/attachment.htm>