[Bug 1984] CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_STACK_SIZE vs CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_TASK_STACK_SIZE

[bugzilla-daemon at rtems.org]

https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1984

Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sebastian.huber at embedded-br
                   |                            |ains.de

--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> 2011-12-08 01:37:33 CST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is fine. I still am not convinced the default behavior of propagating
> user-defined CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_STACK_SIZE to the idle stack size and the
> interrupt stack size is a good idea, considering there are specific CONFIGURE
> macros for overriding those.

This is one of the strange things I noticed while implementing PR 1924.

Using the normal minimum stack size for the idle thread is a huge waste of
memory in most systems.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.