[Bug 1984] CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_STACK_SIZE vs CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_TASK_STACK_SIZE

[bugzilla-daemon at rtems.org]

https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1984

--- Comment #5 from Gedare <gedare at rtems.org> 2011-12-08 09:20:52 CST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > This is fine. I still am not convinced the default behavior of propagating
> > user-defined CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_STACK_SIZE to the idle stack size and the
> > interrupt stack size is a good idea, considering there are specific CONFIGURE
> > macros for overriding those.
> 
> This is one of the strange things I noticed while implementing PR 1924.
> 
> Using the normal minimum stack size for the idle thread is a huge waste of
> memory in most systems.

Yes we've started to discuss this on the devel list. Might be time to open a PR
about this specific quirk before it gets lost in the shuffle.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.