[RTEMS Project] #2795: Overrun Handling for general real-time models
RTEMS trac
trac at rtems.org
Wed Jan 25 06:33:58 UTC 2017
#2795: Overrun Handling for general real-time models
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: khchen | Owner: Gedare Bloom
| <gedare@…>
Type: enhancement | Status: reopened
Priority: high | Milestone: 4.12
Component: cpukit | Version: 4.11
Severity: blocker | Resolution:
Keywords: Overrun, RMS, SP, |
Scheduler, Periodicity |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by sebastian.huber):
The missed count is just a statistic.
For the integer overflow in
{{{
#!c
static void _Rate_monotonic_Renew_deadline(
Rate_monotonic_Control *the_period,
Thread_Control *owner,
ISR_lock_Context *lock_context
)
{
uint64_t deadline;
++the_period->postponed_jobs;
the_period->state = RATE_MONOTONIC_EXPIRED;
deadline = _Watchdog_Per_CPU_insert_relative(
&the_period->Timer,
_Per_CPU_Get(),
the_period->next_length
);
the_period->latest_deadline = deadline;
_Rate_monotonic_Release( the_period, lock_context );
}
}}}
we have some options.
1. Ignore it, then postponed jobs count will be zero again.
2. Issue a new fatal error.
3. Saturate, e.g. stay at 0xffffffff.
I am in favour of 3. It should be documented in any way.
--
Ticket URL: <http://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2795#comment:18>
RTEMS Project <http://www.rtems.org/>
RTEMS Project
More information about the bugs
mailing list