RTEMS | membench: Add memory benchmark programs (!110)

[Chris Johns (@chris)]

Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/110#note_108970


Separate repos was discuss before central existed and it was decided we continue as is, separate. I have not been involved in `rtems-central` and cannot answer why it has followed the path it has.

If tools the `rtems.git` repo depends on are in `rtems-tools` they will be available when a user begins an RTEMS build. We have `rtems-test`, `rtems-syms` and coverage as examples. The template of doing this is established and works. Without suitable tooling available to everyone I am not sure why we would have the tests in this repo? All it will do is slow the build down.

Before the move to `waf` I removed the post-link `size` print because all it did was add an extra exec call into the build and with hundreds of sizes prints for the test builds the data was never looked at. Further those interested could easily script a print of the sizes.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/110#note_108970
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20240710/83edc232/attachment.htm>