RTEMS | Improve arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu BSP familiy (!230)

[Chris Johns (@chris)]

Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/230#note_112743


In regards to "the details are in the patch", I did not see this detail. This conversation makes it easier for others to see what is happening and how things are designed. I do not assuming everyone sees what you or I do.

Can the RPU determine if it is in lock step mode or which core it is?

I suggest a single BSP name `zynqmp_rpu` with defaults for a single address space block and basic initialization that can run the tests. INI options can then change the address map and the initialization as required.

A BSP name will go only so far before it does not help. There are too many combinations to expand into BSP names to be practical, for example `zynqmp_rpu_split_0_apu` etc. You would also need `zynqmp_apu_rpu_0` and `zynqmp_apu_rpu_0_1` etc if you wish to run all the APU codes with both RPU cores.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/230#note_112743
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20241001/84f7dac4/attachment-0001.htm>