Documentation | Document Python versions and what we test (#113)

[Chris Johns (@chris)]

Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/docs/rtems-docs/-/issues/113#note_128462


This issue is about documenting a policy and not the outcome of the policy and how it could be applied. :smile: 

We need to define an upper version to manage the new features we can use. For example there is no point using a type checking syntax only available in 3.12. Testing down from a base version is welcome but it is not a requirement for those developing Python code for our tools.

Documenting what works on Linux is a good idea however that is out of scope of for a policy other than the policy needs to be usable. I am sorry but I do not use Linux and have not idea about distributions or how to handle that sort of thing. I suggest topics on the User forum to manage that information. It is dynamic and that tool may prove useful in handling the changes and user feedback.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/docs/rtems-docs/-/issues/113#note_128462
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20250808/2c1a0037/attachment.htm>