RTEMS Source Builder | Next (Bleeding Edge) Version Numbers are Annoying (#92)

[Chris Johns (@chris)]

Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems-source-builder/-/issues/92#note_119736


It is simplest path to ensure the build is as close to what we need. What about:

```
edge/rtems-arm
...
edge/rtems-edge.bset
```

etc for all the archs being built. If an arch is not support on the gcc edge there is no build set present. The `edge/rtems-arm` file would hold:

```
%define release 1
%define rtems_arch arm
%include edge/rtems-default.bset
```

and so on. This method means there are `tools/rtems-gcc-edge.cfg` etc configs that hold the source defines.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems-source-builder/-/issues/92#note_119736
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20250212/2ec87866/attachment.htm>