RTEMS Source Builder | Next (Bleeding Edge) Version Numbers are Annoying (#92)

[Chris Johns (@chris)]

Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems-source-builder/-/issues/92#note_119840


Should we separate the type of tool builds into:

1.  Development version, ie 7 tools
2.  Next major release of the tools across the set of tools as `next`, ie gcc, binutils and gdb
3.  Upstream development as `edge` to mean the bleeding edge of these tools?

The use of `next` and `edge` does not change the target tool names. Currently they would all be `*-rtems7-*` . You need to manage sandboxing them to keep things separate.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems-source-builder/-/issues/92#note_119840
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20250213/78d3e07b/attachment.htm>