RTEMS | Refactor the first-fit heap implementation for modular allocator support (#5620)

[mazen Adel (@mez3n)]

mazen Adel commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/work_items/5620#note_153991


The current overview is divided across these 3 issues: 

rtems/rtos/rtems#5620

https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/work_items/5619

https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/work_items/5633

I will make sure to look into the boundary condition. As I was going  to look into these issues https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/work_items/3582, https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/work_items/3755.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/work_items/5620#note_153991
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/sent_notifications/4-6svtvshskh0k9ojbm153e5257-1d/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.rtems.org/help


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20260708/456e518f/attachment-0001.htm>