RTEMS | Draft: rtems/bsps: Test software code placed inside #if #endif (!1078)

[Samuel Viegas (@samuel.viegas)]

Samuel Viegas commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1078#note_149972


Ok, thank you for your input. So, by not allowing raising interrupts above vector 15 could the dangerous code just be substituted with a return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED, or should the else be removed completely? Regarding the tests, since the goal is just to keep the branch coverage at 100%, would a simple loop iterating from vector 16 to 31 be sufficient?

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1078#note_149972
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20260513/b7a5ad45/attachment.htm>