body functions

[Chris Johns]

On 9/12/11 3:44 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> We have high standards for coverage and those are necessary
>> to achieve that.
> Well, 5000 warnings with several really serious ones amongst them speak
> a clear language and seriously question RTEMS's QA efforts so far.

This is sounding like a challenge. :)

Is it possible to monitor this and to see how many are false positives, 
clean ups and real bugs there are ? Also given the score is the main 
area that has been tested I think anything found here that is a bug can 
be marked that way.

Chris