chrisj at rtems.org
Fri Dec 9 23:22:21 UTC 2011
On 9/12/11 3:44 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> We have high standards for coverage and those are necessary
>> to achieve that.
> Well, 5000 warnings with several really serious ones amongst them speak
> a clear language and seriously question RTEMS's QA efforts so far.
This is sounding like a challenge. :)
Is it possible to monitor this and to see how many are false positives,
clean ups and real bugs there are ? Also given the score is the main
area that has been tested I think anything found here that is a bug can
be marked that way.
More information about the devel