gedare at rtems.org
Sun Apr 15 18:13:29 UTC 2012
This sounds like a bug we should file a PR.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Joel Sherrill
<joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
> FWIW the fifo/pipe code was a previous year's gsoc. It does not have full code coverage and I recall that Coverity had issues with it. I would not be surprised at issues.
> An efficient key-like object and condition variable in the Classic API would be great. Especially if the score is enhanced so the API versions are just wrappers or users of score capabilities.
> Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>>On 12/04/12 10:30 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Please note that this approach is not SMP proof. I think we need
>>> condition variables in the RTEMS Classic API.
>>I agree. It is needed. I also would like to see a classic API version of
>>the POSIX keys as part of an attempt to remove the task variables API.
>>rtems-devel mailing list
>>rtems-devel at rtems.org
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
More information about the devel