lm32 and m68k isr entry
ralf.corsepius at rtems.org
Sun Apr 15 21:50:55 UTC 2012
On 04/15/2012 11:08 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Is there any good reason that the lm32 and m68k ports define their own
> versions of rtems_isr_entry?
I don't know about these 2 ports in particular, but historically the
reason why there isn't general rtems_isr_entry in RTEMS had been:
There are different demands on different targets, which had rendered
implementing a generally applicable approach to isr-handling impossible
or at least suboptimal.
Of cause, this doesn't exclude there might be places where some
historically accumulated stuff unified.
More information about the devel