lm32 and m68k isr entry

Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsepius at rtems.org
Sun Apr 15 21:50:55 UTC 2012

On 04/15/2012 11:08 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there any good reason that the lm32 and m68k ports define their own
> versions of rtems_isr_entry?

I don't know about these 2 ports in particular, but historically the 
reason why there isn't general rtems_isr_entry in RTEMS had been:

There are different demands on different targets, which had rendered 
implementing a generally applicable approach to isr-handling impossible 
or at least suboptimal.

Of cause, this doesn't exclude there might be places where some 
historically accumulated stuff unified.


More information about the devel mailing list