lm32 and m68k isr entry

Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org
Sun Apr 15 21:35:08 UTC 2012

I'm already doing a massive bit of work that is touching simiilar code
(ref the set_vector email subject line SPARC BSPS: added defines for
set_vec type argument to bsp.h )

I will fix these two ports as well.

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Joel Sherrill
<joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
> History for m68k. Cut and paste for lm32.
> And now. A clean up patch would be appreciated although it is likely to propoagate to BSPs
> Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>>Is there any good reason that the lm32 and m68k ports define their own
>>versions of rtems_isr_entry?
>>We have:
>>typedef void rtems_isr;
>>typedef rtems_isr ( *rtems_isr_entry )(
>>                 rtems_vector_number
>>             );
>>For lm32:
>>typedef void lm32_isr;
>>typedef lm32_isr ( *lm32_isr_entry )( void );
>>For m68k:
>>typedef void m68k_isr;
>>typedef void ( *m68k_isr_entry )( void );
>>rtems-devel mailing list
>>rtems-devel at rtems.org

More information about the devel mailing list