RFC: set vector changes

[Gedare Bloom]

I'm going to break that up into a couple of smaller patches. I will
resend when ready. Some of them might be small enough to email the
list directly. The massive "rename" patch will probably still need a
branch though.

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In view of discussion [1] on generalizing set vector across the simple
> vectored architectures I have pushed a branch that unifies a lot of
> the set vector code. Please review this code.
> http://git.rtems.org/gedare/rtems.git/commit/?h=setvec
>
> It touches many BSPs most of which I cannot test and don't have time
> to deal with compiling. I compiled one BSP from each target just to
> get by. We need a better way to test :)
>
> -Gedare
>
> [1] http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-devel/2012-March/000493.html