RFC: set vector changes

[Gedare Bloom]

OK now I have broken it up into smaller pieces. I may send some of the
patches to the list in the next few days but they also are available
in my repo in the setvec branch.

-Gedare

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> I'm going to break that up into a couple of smaller patches. I will
> resend when ready. Some of them might be small enough to email the
> list directly. The massive "rename" patch will probably still need a
> branch though.
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In view of discussion [1] on generalizing set vector across the simple
>> vectored architectures I have pushed a branch that unifies a lot of
>> the set vector code. Please review this code.
>> http://git.rtems.org/gedare/rtems.git/commit/?h=setvec
>>
>> It touches many BSPs most of which I cannot test and don't have time
>> to deal with compiling. I compiled one BSP from each target just to
>> get by. We need a better way to test :)
>>
>> -Gedare
>>
>> [1] http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-devel/2012-March/000493.html