libbsd: rtems-bsd-subr.c and rtems-bsd-cyclecount.c

[Jennifer Averett]

I made a seperate file on the rtems-bsd-subr.c  because I didn't know if we would end 
up adding more thatn one routine in there by the time it works correctly and I feared putting
it in the bsd file would make it too cluttered and harder to track.   However,  I can move
the code into the bsd file if that is what is decided.  

The cyclecount method is in a board dependent file (cpu.h) which was defined to be an
empty file for us.  Would it be better to put it into the file we defined as empty and make
it an RTEMS defined file?

Jennifer Averett
On-Line Applications Research
________________________________________
From: rtems-devel-bounces at rtems.org [rtems-devel-bounces at rtems.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Huber [sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:59 AM
To: RTEMS
Subject: libbsd: rtems-bsd-subr.c and rtems-bsd-cyclecount.c

Hi,

do we really need separate files for simple replacement functions?  It is
better to have the FreeBSD code and the RTEMS replacement in one place.
Firstly we see what it should do and secondly we notice updates in the FreeBSD
version.

Things are different if we replace complete implementations like MUTEX(9), e.g.
rtems-bsd-mtx.c.

Every libbsd file should include

#include <freebsd/machine/rtems-bsd-config.h>

as the first header file.  This file includes some standard header files in the
right order.

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax     : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel at rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel