RFC: Rename existing ChangeLogs

Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsepius at rtems.org
Fri Feb 17 16:58:12 UTC 2012

On 02/17/2012 05:39 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi,
> Now that ChangeLogs are not being updated,
.. a fact I consider to be a serious regression, which needs to be reverted.

... ATM, you do not see what has changed without digging deeply into git.

> leaving them
> in place is potentially confusing.
That's an utter understatement. The current state is unusable.

> I have already had one user
> ask privately why a change wasn't listed in it.

> I propose we rename them. Possible destination names:
> ChangeLog-pregit
> ChangeLog-cvs
> ChangeLog-pre2012
> Comments?
I propose to resume the old conventions of manually writing ChangeLogs.


More information about the devel mailing list