RFC: Rename existing ChangeLogs
ralf.corsepius at rtems.org
Fri Feb 17 16:58:12 UTC 2012
On 02/17/2012 05:39 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Now that ChangeLogs are not being updated,
.. a fact I consider to be a serious regression, which needs to be reverted.
... ATM, you do not see what has changed without digging deeply into git.
> leaving them
> in place is potentially confusing.
That's an utter understatement. The current state is unusable.
> I have already had one user
> ask privately why a change wasn't listed in it.
> I propose we rename them. Possible destination names:
I propose to resume the old conventions of manually writing ChangeLogs.
More information about the devel