[rtems commit] score: Support static_assert and _Static_assert

[Gedare Bloom]

What function is not gauranteed to exist? It looks to me like there is
sufficient checking for compiler versions, and fall back to a simple
integer ternary conditional check...

Looks all right to me

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius at rtems.org> wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 10:20 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>
>> Module:    rtems
>> Branch:    master
>> Commit:    e278f8b7d9456cb7d051da06a4b011b9568831dc
>> Changeset:
>> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=e278f8b7d9456cb7d051da06a4b011b9568831dc
>>
>> Author:    Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>
>> Date:      Sun Nov  4 19:56:34 2012 +0100
>>
>> score: Support static_assert and _Static_assert
>>
> Sebastian, this patch is NOT OK with me!!!
>
> What you are doing here is polluting the source tree with functions which
> are not guaranteed to exist.
>
>
> Ralf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel