[rtems commit] score: Support static_assert and _Static_assert

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 11/06/2012 01:59 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 12:33 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 11/06/2012 10:20 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Module:    rtems
>>> Branch:    master
>>> Commit:    e278f8b7d9456cb7d051da06a4b011b9568831dc
>>> Changeset:
>>> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=e278f8b7d9456cb7d051da06a4b011b9568831dc 
>>>
>>>
>>> Author:    Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>
>>> Date:      Sun Nov  4 19:56:34 2012 +0100
>>>
>>> score: Support static_assert and _Static_assert
>>>
>> Sebastian, this patch is NOT OK with me!!!
>>
>> What you are doing here is polluting the source tree with functions 
>> which are
>> not guaranteed to exist.
>
> The static_assert and _Static_assert are no functions.  These are C or 
> C++ language keywords.  They are mandatory for the respective standard 
> revision.
>
Right, static_assert is a bleeding edge C++ keyword.

But RTEMS is implemented in C => C++ extensions make no sense in RTEMS 
headers.

What you are doing here is silly.

Ralf