[PATCH 1/5] libmm score API

Sebastian Huber sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Tue Aug 27 08:19:17 UTC 2013


On 2013-08-26 20:24, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
>      >> #define RTEMS_MM_REGION_BIT_READ 0
>      >> #define RTEMS_MM_REGION_BIT_WRITE 1
>      >> #define RTEMS_MM_REGION_BIT_EXECUTE 2
>      >> #define RTEMS_MM_REGION_BIT_CACHE 3
>      >> #define RTEMS_MM_REGION_BIT_DEVICE 4
>      >> #define RTEMS_MM_REGION_BIT_SHARED 5
>      >>
>      > Some of these flags are not supported on some architectures like
>      > RTEMS_MM_REGION_BIT_SHARED, or targets that do not have
>      > Cache Unit. How should we handle some of these flags for such
>      > targets that do not support these features in hardware ?
>     I would think the BSP will have to handle / ignore the attributes that
>     do not make sense for it?
>
> I think of that solution too. But the developer may expect to apply this
> attribute and wonder why it does not work as expected.

Without support for cache, memory order and coherency attributes this API is 
useless on systems which need such stuff.

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.



More information about the devel mailing list