Fixed size cpusetf patch

[Sebastian Huber]

On 2013-12-17 15:08, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 7:27 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> >On 2013-12-17 14:20, Jennifer Averett wrote:
>>> >>I started out with it as one, but because of the way the tests run
>>> >>a lot of data comes out (one line for each comparison).  I split them
>>> >>up so each test doesn't output so many screens of data.  If I put them
>>> >>back as one, would it be better only print at the top of the test (ex.
>>> >>AND test) then print details upon a failure within that (this doesn't
>>> >>match the way other tests work though)
>> >
>> >The only interesting output is the "END OF TEST" message, since this checked by
>> >the RTEMS testing script.  I case of failure you get an assert message, this
>> >should be enough.
>> >
> Depends on what you mean by interesting. The intent
> was to note what the test was doing before the asserts.

If I run the tests I don't care about the test output at all.  I look at the 
check_endof output.

>
> Combining the tests also has a tendency to give us huge tests
> which don't run on all targets.  I don't know in this case
> how large the resulting combined test would be.

I don't think these trivial bit manipulations leads in huge test binaries.

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.