ARM GCC changes

[Joel Sherrill]

On 2/20/2013 2:55 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 02/17/2013 09:23 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> Can we get this fixed? I needed to test something on ARM today, and It
>> took me awhile to figure out where/how to get ARM tools, and I even
>> knew about this eabi issue. This is annoying, and the longer it drags
>> out the worse it is likely to be to fix.
>>
>> Please get rid of this arm-rtemseabi naming scheme.
> Its up to the RTEMS GCC maintainers to commit the patches posted here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00939.html
>
My analysis shows that this is correct on the head and incorrect
on the 4.6 and 4.7 branches.

Is the 4.5 branch of interest?

I want to discuss with the GCC ARM and branch maintainers
what is appropriate to commit to the branches.

FWIW this is an unacceptable situation and never should have
happened.

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985