[PATCH] Updated Legacy code in arm rtl22xx

[Vipul Nayyar]

If I don't need that intermediate variable, then my previous patch containing
void cs8900_isr(cs8900_device *cs){
 cs8900_interrupt(LPC22xx_INTERRUPT_EINT2, cs); 
}
,should be correct right ? 

I followed the flow of bsp_interrupt_handler_dispatch() & where it leads, but couldn't figure out much. Will try again tomorrow.

I still don't understand what mistake I'm doing regarding removing superfluous entities from the code. :-(

Regards
Vipul Nayyar 



________________________________
 From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>
To: Vipul Nayyar <nayyar_vipul at yahoo.com> 
Cc: "rtems-devel at rtems.org" <rtems-devel at rtems.org> 
Sent: Saturday, 13 July 2013 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updated Legacy code in arm rtl22xx
 

On 12/07/13 17:30, Vipul Nayyar wrote:
> Ok, So before sending the updated patch I'll list in advance what I'm gonna change, so that we don't have to go through this again.
>
> 1) Change cs8900_isr to static. The sample code would be:
> static void cs8900_isr(void *arg)
> {
>      cs8900_device *cs = arg;
>      cs8900_interrupt(LPC22xx_INTERRUPT_EINT2, cs);
> }

This is all right in principle, but you don't need the intermediate 
variable.

Now the questions are:

1. Who will call this function?

2. Where does the actual arg argument value come from?

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130713/0d9cd401/attachment-0001.html>