[PATCH 1/2] libmm score and stubs

[Rempel, Cynthia]

>On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Rempel, Cynthia
><cynt6007 at vandals.uidaho.edu> wrote:
>>>________________________________________
>>>From: gedare at gwmail.gwu.edu [gedare at gwmail.gwu.edu] on behalf of Gedare Bloom [gedare at rtems.org]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:19 AM
>>>To: Rempel, Cynthia
>>>Cc: Hesham AL-Matary; rtems-devel at rtems.org
>>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libmm score and stubs
>>>
>>>On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Rempel, Cynthia
>>><cynt6007 at vandals.uidaho.edu> wrote:
>>>> Hi Hesham,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for doing the stubs :)
>>>> Could you pull all the implementation specific parts of mm.h and mm.inl into a header called mmimpl.h ?
>>>> It would then match the header-style score is heading towards...
>>>> If the no_memorymanagement.c is for devices without mm support, could you have the functions print out a "stub warning/error" message? That way the user knows not to rely on memory management...
>>>>
>>>I don't think we should have the stubs do anything in the normal case.
>> Why?
>We should not add print statements to kernel code. Some users may
>prefer to leave the stubs in place despite the lack of functionality.
>
>Maybe you mean a compile-time warning, which would be fine to add.
That sounds perfect :) Thanks!