[PATCH 1/2] libmm score and stubs

[Gedare Bloom]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Rempel, Cynthia
<cynt6007 at vandals.uidaho.edu> wrote:
>>________________________________________
>>From: gedare at gwmail.gwu.edu [gedare at gwmail.gwu.edu] on behalf of Gedare Bloom [gedare at rtems.org]
>>Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:19 AM
>>To: Rempel, Cynthia
>>Cc: Hesham AL-Matary; rtems-devel at rtems.org
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libmm score and stubs
>>
>>On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Rempel, Cynthia
>><cynt6007 at vandals.uidaho.edu> wrote:
>>> Hi Hesham,
>>>
>>> Thanks for doing the stubs :)
>>> Could you pull all the implementation specific parts of mm.h and mm.inl into a header called mmimpl.h ?
>>> It would then match the header-style score is heading towards...
>>> If the no_memorymanagement.c is for devices without mm support, could you have the functions print out a "stub warning/error" message? That way the user knows not to rely on memory management...
>>>
>>I don't think we should have the stubs do anything in the normal case.
> Why?
We should not add print statements to kernel code. Some users may
prefer to leave the stubs in place despite the lack of functionality.

Maybe you mean a compile-time warning, which would be fine to add.

>>We could add something when RTEMS_DEBUG is enabled.
>
>