SMP Implementation Status

[Joel Sherrill]

On 4/16/2014 3:56 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello Jeff,
>
> I updated the status subsections in the implementation section.
Thanks but I am having trouble still trying to figure out what a short
summary should be. I would like the summary table to have phrases
like:

+ complete
+ basic functionality complete with future enhancements identified
+ no work done
+ in process
+ partially complete

Picking on Low-level start
(http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/SMP#Low-Level_Start)
as an example, the Status is a description of the implementation. Beyond the
single phrase "is guided by" which implies it does it now and no Future
Directions,
the description does not give one a hint as to what state this idea/task
is in.

My idea behind the summary table was to have a "red/green/yellow" view of
everything that was identified at a glance.

--joel
> On 2014-04-15 18:15, Jeff Mayes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I’m trying to create a table on the RTEMS Wiki to monitor the SMP
>> implementation efforts.  See http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/SMP.  For
>> anyone working in this area, would you please share the status of your efforts?
>>   Not looking for deep details, just high level comments about any ongoing and
>> future implementation.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtems-devel mailing list
>> rtems-devel at rtems.org
>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
>>
>

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985