SMP Implementation Status
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Thu Apr 17 14:12:31 UTC 2014
On 2014-04-17 16:04, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 4/16/2014 3:56 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> >Hello Jeff,
>> >
>> >I updated the status subsections in the implementation section.
> Thanks but I am having trouble still trying to figure out what a short
> summary should be. I would like the summary table to have phrases
> like:
>
> + complete
> + basic functionality complete with future enhancements identified
> + no work done
> + in process
> + partially complete
>
> Picking on Low-level start
> (http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/SMP#Low-Level_Start)
> as an example, the Status is a description of the implementation. Beyond the
> single phrase "is guided by" which implies it does it now and no Future
> Directions,
> the description does not give one a hint as to what state this idea/task
> is in.
>
> My idea behind the summary table was to have a "red/green/yellow" view of
> everything that was identified at a glance.
No future directions means its green, everything is fine.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel
mailing list