[rtems commit] rtems: Account for file system semaphores.
Chris Johns
chrisj at rtems.org
Sun Apr 27 23:46:17 UTC 2014
On 28/04/2014 9:38 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Look
> On Apr 27, 2014 5:35 PM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 27/04/2014 10:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > > On 04/26/2014 08:03 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
> > >> On 25/04/2014 11:51 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > >>> The intention with confdefs is that the user does not have to
> > >>> know the implicit requirements of the higher level capability
> > >>> they configured. User configures number of file descriptors,
> > >>> Ada tasks, etc.
> > >>>
> > >>> So if a filesystem needs resources, confdefs.h should reserve
> > >>> them.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> If the user needs more than 1 mount per configured file system the
> > >> user will need to supply that number.
> > >
> > > The file system tests should use this new mechanism.
> > >
> >
> > Do any tests use more than one instance of a configured file system ?
>
> The only case I can think of off the top of my head is mounted imfs tests.
>
Does the IMFS use a semaphore ? I do not think I added one for that file
system. I grep'ed the libfs tree and did not see anything.
None of the fstests fail on the Beagleboard.
Chris
More information about the devel
mailing list