[rtems commit] rtems: Account for file system semaphores.

[Chris Johns]

On 28/04/2014 9:38 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Look
> On Apr 27, 2014 5:35 PM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>  >
>  > On 27/04/2014 10:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>  > > On 04/26/2014 08:03 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
>  > >> On 25/04/2014 11:51 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>  > >>> The intention with confdefs is that the user does not have to
>  > >>> know the implicit requirements of the higher level capability
>  > >>> they configured. User configures number of file descriptors,
>  > >>> Ada tasks, etc.
>  > >>>
>  > >>> So if a filesystem needs resources, confdefs.h should reserve
>  > >>> them.
>  > >>>
>  > >>
>  > >> If the user needs more than 1 mount per configured file system the
>  > >> user will need to supply that number.
>  > >
>  > > The file system tests should use this new mechanism.
>  > >
>  >
>  > Do any tests use more than one instance of a configured file system ?
>
> The only case I can think of off the top of my head is mounted imfs tests.
>

Does the IMFS use a semaphore ? I do not think I added one for that file 
system. I grep'ed the libfs tree and did not see anything.

None of the fstests fail on the Beagleboard.

Chris