[rtems commit] rtems: Account for file system semaphores.

[Joel Sherrill]

Look
On Apr 27, 2014 5:35 PM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>
> On 27/04/2014 10:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > On 04/26/2014 08:03 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
> >> On 25/04/2014 11:51 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>> The intention with confdefs is that the user does not have to
> >>> know the implicit requirements of the higher level capability
> >>> they configured. User configures number of file descriptors,
> >>> Ada tasks, etc.
> >>>
> >>> So if a filesystem needs resources, confdefs.h should reserve
> >>> them.
> >>>
> >>
> >> If the user needs more than 1 mount per configured file system the
> >> user will need to supply that number.
> >
> > The file system tests should use this new mechanism.
> >
>
> Do any tests use more than one instance of a configured file system ?

The only case I can think of off the top of my head is mounted imfs tests.

> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140427/7cb09500/attachment-0001.html>