patch for cpuset test to check for cpuset in newlib

Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org
Fri Feb 21 01:56:30 UTC 2014


I'd like a plan for removing the checks. Perhaps each release cycle
should sweep up these feature checks as the tools get stabilized?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Joel Sherrill
<joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/20/2014 3:12 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> Do we do this with other newlib features?
> Various configure.ac's have these type of tests in them. I know we
> have code which uses them. It is likely other tests do as well.
>
> We are trying to ease the bump with older tools and minimize the
> risk that git bisect can't work.
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jennifer Averett
>> <Jennifer.Averett at oarcorp.com> wrote:
>>> The attached patch adds the check for cpuset.h in newlib
>>> into the cpuset test.
>>>
>>> Jennifer Averett
>>> On-Line Applications Research
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtems-devel mailing list
>>> rtems-devel at rtems.org
>>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtems-devel mailing list
>> rtems-devel at rtems.org
>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
>
> --
> Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
> joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
> Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
> Support Available                (256) 722-9985
>



More information about the devel mailing list