Patches for classic affinity implementation and test

[Gedare Bloom]

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 2014-02-21 02:55, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >>I would prefer to see symmetry between our choice to use cpu_set_t as
>>>> >>the opaque type for the cpu bit sets. Thus I recommend using the score
>>>> >>name _Cpu_set for the handler. (It is unfortunate that we can't use
>>>> >>_CPU_set because that would clash with the score CPU namespace.)
>>>
>>> >If we drop the _, it could be _CPUSet_Xxx.
>>
>> _CPUSet is ok.
>>
>
> I prefer _CPU_set_Some_other_thing.
>
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel