Patches for classic affinity implementation and test

[Gedare Bloom]

Last message had no body. Oops.

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>> On 2014-02-21 02:55, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >>I would prefer to see symmetry between our choice to use cpu_set_t as
>>>>> >>the opaque type for the cpu bit sets. Thus I recommend using the score
>>>>> >>name _Cpu_set for the handler. (It is unfortunate that we can't use
>>>>> >>_CPU_set because that would clash with the score CPU namespace.)
>>>>
>>>> >If we drop the _, it could be _CPUSet_Xxx.
>>>
>>> _CPUSet is ok.
>>>
>>
>> I prefer _CPU_set_Some_other_thing.
>>
The problem is that _CPU_set_Some_other_thing overlaps slightly with
the _CPU_ namespace we use for cpu-dependent score code. However,
since the "set" is not capitalized, we can differentiate the case. I
also prefer _CPU_set_Xxx for symmetry with the type names we chose.

>> --
>> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>>
>> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
>> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
>> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
>> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>>
>> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtems-devel mailing list
>> rtems-devel at rtems.org
>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel