OS Web Monitor

[Chirayu Desai]

Sorry, what I wrote wasn't what I did, what the patch contains.

rtems bin2c is installed as rtems-bin2c, but the Makefile for oswebmonitor
was calling bin2c (and in the path where rtems-bin2c is installed), so what
I did is s/bin2c/rtems-bin2c/ for the Makefile


On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius at rtems.org>wrote:

> On 01/05/2014 12:41 PM, Nick Withers wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 12:01 +0530, Chirayu Desai wrote:
>>
>>> I've uploaded two patches for oswebmonitor, [1] and [2]
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] fixes a minor issue with bin2c being installed as rtems-bin2c
>>>
>>
>> I thought that was on purpose...? Not sure it should be installed as
>> bin2c, as that could clash with a host binary.
>>
>> Are there actually any RTEMS-specifics in rtems-bin2c?
>>
>
> RTEMS rtems-bin2c is a fork of another bin2c program, which once was
> available somewhere on the net - I.e. it is RTEMS specific-
>
> Also, googling for bin2c returns several other bin2c-programs whose
> relation and CLI-compatibility to rtems-bin2c isn't known to me.
>
> That said, IMO, rtems-bin2c should remain named "rtems-bin2c".
>
> Ralf
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140105/375f9cce/attachment-0001.html>