[PATCH] i386/virtualpok BSP, virtual BSP to be used with POK, build with enable-paravirt

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Mon Jan 6 23:14:43 UTC 2014

On 7/01/2014 4:24 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 1/6/2014 11:13 AM, Philipp Eppelt wrote:
>> Where are we on this?
> I think I was OK on it. If Gedare is also, then it should be merged.

How will this change be tested on a regular basis ? As we move to 
constant integration testing we need a way to test this code.

I would like to understand how this extra dependency is tested and 
managed on an on going basis before getting my support.


More information about the devel mailing list