OS Web Monitor

[Chirayu Desai]

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> the top 4 commits at
> https://github.com/chirayudesai/rtems-network-demos/commits/osmonweb
> appear to be the ones to look at / test.

Right, that should be good for testing.
However, since I merged osmonweb with commit history (
https://github.com/chirayudesai/rtems-network-demos/commits/osmonweb/osmonweb),
if my fork is to be merged into the rtems network-demos repository, pulling
/ merging my repository would be better I think, right?

>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Joel Sherrill
> <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
> > Where is the patch so I can review it?
> >
> > On 1/17/2014 8:29 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I won't support this relocation until the build is confirmed. Thanks!
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Chirayu Desai <chirayudesai1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> I have moved oswebmonitor to network-demos, preserving commit history.
> >>> The content of the repository osmonweb.git has been added to a new
> directory
> >>> osmonweb.
> >>> The tree can be browsed at [1].
> >>>
> >>> All commits but the last 2 don't touch anything in the topdir, only
> add /
> >>> modify content under the osmonweb directory.
> >>>
> >>> It does not build with 4.11 (didn't before this merge, like I said in
> the
> >>> original message), and I do not have 4.10 built and installed
> currently, so
> >>> as of now it is untested.
> >>> I will test it by later today / tomorrow if time permits.
> >>>
> >>> Also, looks like the code under http/ (in network-demos) is for "test
> of
> >>> GoAhead web server", which is deprecated, so it doesn't build with 4.11
> >>>
> >>> [1]: https://github.com/chirayudesai/rtems-network-demos
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Nick Withers <nick at nickwithers.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 09:44 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>>>> On 1/5/2014 5:41 AM, Nick Withers wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 12:01 +0530, Chirayu Desai wrote:
> >>>>>>> I've uploaded two patches for oswebmonitor, [1] and [2]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] fixes a minor issue with bin2c being installed as rtems-bin2c
> >>>>>> I thought that was on purpose...? Not sure it should be installed as
> >>>>>> bin2c, as that could clash with a host binary.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Are there actually any RTEMS-specifics in rtems-bin2c?
> >>>>> No. It just wasn't packaged and it is a commonly needed utility when
> >>>>> building
> >>>>> up filesystem images.
> >>>> Yeah, fair enough (I'm using it myself).
> >>>>
> >>>> It doesn't seem to be packaged on either FreeBSD or Ubuntu, otherwise
> I
> >>>> was gonna suggest removing it in favour of the host binary (which
> still
> >>>> seems like it'd be optimal in the ideal world).
> >>>>
> >>>> P.S., Cheers for the earlier clarification Chirayu :-)
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> [2] removes support for GoAhead
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>
> https://gist.github.com/chirayudesai/d8e72a999cb02e2d9dcd/raw/a869794c687cfbf9575efe8195245a7a4ac8992d/0001-make-bin2c-is-installed-as-rtems-bin2c.patch
> >>>>>>> [2]:
> >>>>>>>
> https://gist.github.com/chirayudesai/d8e72a999cb02e2d9dcd/raw/55b65f128daf2ad532e83b6d44b976de51cae64c/0001-remove-support-for-GoAhead.patch
> >>>> --
> >>>> Nick Withers
> >>>> email: nick at nickwithers.com
> >>>> Web: http://www.nickwithers.com
> >>>> Mobile: +61 414 397 446
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> rtems-devel mailing list
> >>>> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> >>>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> rtems-devel mailing list
> >>> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> >>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
> >>>
> >
> > --
> > Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
> > joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
> > Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
> > Support Available                (256) 722-9985
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140118/7d2f762e/attachment-0001.html>