RTEMS toolchain for Epiphany?

[Hesham Moustafa]

On Thu Nov 13 2014 at 5:58:25 PM Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On November 13, 2014 11:56:32 AM CST, Hesham Moustafa <
> heshamelmatary at gmail.com> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >I want to let you know that I found their main repos [1] Can I start
> >from there? Imitating what has been done with OpenRISC?
> >
>
> Basically. Except you only need their repos for binutils and gdb. We use
> GCC and Newlib from upstream.
>
> Great, I am waiting for these patches.

> I have binutils patches
>
> >[1] https://github.com/adapteva
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Hesham
> >
> >On Thu Nov 13 2014 at 3:29:14 PM Hesham Moustafa
> ><heshamelmatary at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >On Thu Nov 13 2014 at 2:59:33 PM Joel Sherrill
> ><joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 11/13/2014 8:07 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>
> >> On November 13, 2014 6:30:48 AM CST, Hesham Moustafa
> ><heshamelmatary at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I want to ask about the status of RTEMS toolchain for Epiphany
> >>> architecture. I think Joel mentioned that there are some previous
> >>> support for it; and if yes, does the toolchain need some additional
> >>> work?
> >> To give you a quick answer, I emailed the people who did the port.
> >There apparently is a github repo with some of it and some is merged. I
> >will dig through the emails and post the proper links.
> >>
> >> One issue they mentioned was that the gdb port had many core/thread
> >support that made it more than a simple port.
> >From Jeremy Bennett:
> >
> >> piphany tool chain development runs on quite a tight budget, and its
> >> GDB implementation is quite complex (it has to pretend cores are
> >> threads, when they don't completely share an address space).  So we
> >> haven't had the effort to devote to upstreaming.  And we were
> >> reluctant to push the simulator upstream without a GDB implementation
> >> to go with it.  You can of course access the code here:
> >>
> >>   https://github.com/adapteva/epiphany-binutils-gdb
> >>
> >> Epiphany GDB is still in quite substantial flux, due to the need to
> >> support the Eclipse multicore visualizer with asynchronous and
> >> non-stop support.
> >The upstream gcc and newlib are OK. But since binutils and gdb are
> >now in a single repo, it will need to come from the github site until
> >it is merged upstream. And obviously patches just need to go upstream
> >to whereever the code is. :)
> >
> >Jeremy also encouraged you to openly discuss things on their forums.
> >He thought you would get good insight and advice there. And I don't
> >doubt that.
> >
> >Thank you, I will.
> >
> >If it is a relatively low volume place, I may track it. But my email
> >volume
> >is already high and I don't have time to poke around on a bulletin
> >board.
> >
> >> It will not have RTEMS as a target but that shouldn't be hard to
> >address once we know where the master binutils, GCC, Newlib, and gdb
> >are.
> >So do you want me to try to build a toolchain and get you some starting
> >patches?
> >
> >Sure that will definitely help as a starting point. And if you are so
> >busy, you can just drop me HOWTO  instructions.
> >
> >> Then you are porting.
> >>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Hesham
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list
> >> devel at rtems.org
> >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
> >--
> >Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
> >joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
> >Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
> >Support Available                (256) 722-9985
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20141113/10173e18/attachment-0002.html>